
One of the most common misconceptions during inspections is that companies fail to distinguish between different types of inspections.
A chemical inspector is not a labor inspector. And a labor inspector is not a chemical inspector.
Chemical inspectors primarily oversee the marketing of chemicals. They are interested in:
- whether you have appropriate permits,
- whether the chemicals are properly registered,
- whether the chemical documentation is compliant with legislation.
Labor inspections focus on entirely different aspects – worker exposure, personal protective equipment, the eighth section of the safety data sheet. These are two separate worlds that often get mixed up in companies' minds.
When a chemical inspector arrives, they will typically check:
- permits (marketing, production, storage),
- whether you have appointed a chemical advisor,
- labels and safety data sheets,
- ISK registrations,
- UFI/PCN, if dealing with hazardous mixtures.
They pay close attention to the consistency of trade names. The trade name must be the same:
- on the label,
- on the safety data sheet,
- in the PCN registration,
- in ISK.
Even a small difference can mean non-compliance. And this is something inspectors notice very quickly.
Surprisingly, some aspects are not examined as thoroughly as one might expect. In storage , inspectors focus mainly on the floors, containment vessels, and basic organization. If there are no obvious issues, they move on quickly.
However, they are very attentive to:
- the language of labels (Slovenian, with certain exceptions for industry),
- the date on the safety data sheet,
- basic label elements (H- and P-statements, pictograms, contact information).
With safety data sheets, often the date alone reveals a lot. If the safety data sheet is very old, the inspector doesn't delve into details – they demand an update.
It's also important to know that inspectors aren't looking for "tricks." Their goal is to verify that the market is compliant with legislation. If they see that the documentation is organized and logical, the inspection proceeds quickly.
The main problem arises when the company itself no longer knows:
- which version of the document is correct,
- what is current,
- and what they should actually present.
That's when the inspection becomes tedious – for both parties.
If you want reliable and quick information on what a chemical inspector actually looks at in your case (and what they don't), it's often most practical to check together. Simply write to me at simona.miklavcic@bens-consulting.eu.
bojan.dimic@bens-consulting.eu





Back to posts